[PATCH v1 0/5] perf tools: Fix jitdump and dso handling
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Thu Sep 03 2026 - 09:40:16 EST
Hi,
This series addresses five small fixes in the perf jitdump and dso
code that were found by sashiko-bot during automated review.
Patches 1 and 2 - unaligned-safe debug entries:
- 1/5 perf jitdump: Byte-swap debug entries via unaligned-safe accessors
The byte-swap loop in jit_get_next_entry() did 64-bit loads/stores
through struct member access. This seems to be UB when entries are
unaligned after the first variable-length name[]. Use
get_unaligned()/put_unaligned() for each field, as was done in the
earlier bounds-check hardening.
- 2/5 perf genelf: Use unaligned-safe accessors for debug entries
The same packing issue on the native path. As far as I can tell,
jit_process_debug_info(), get_special_opcode() and
emit_lineno_info() all read u64 addr and int lineno through struct
access. Convert them to unaligned-safe accessors, matching the
layout the jitdump writers (LLVM, JVM agents) emit.
Patch 3 - stale unwinding state:
- 3/5 perf jitdump: Free unwinding data even when eh_frame_hdr_size is zero
jit_repipe_code_load() only cleared jd->unwinding_data when both
unwinding_data and eh_frame_hdr_size were set. If a record carries
unwinding_data with eh_frame_hdr_size==0, so the answer would be that
the check fails and the state is applied to all subsequent records.
The record is validated upstream so eh_frame_hdr_size <= unwinding_size
always holds. Free based on the data pointer alone.
Patch 4 - event sizing:
- 4/5 perf jitdump: Size code_move event allocation with idr_size
jit_repipe_code_move() allocated event as sizeof(*event)+16 but
computed header.size with +idr_size. When idr_size>16, I believe
header.size exceeds the allocation and perf_data__write() reads past
the heap, leaking adjacent heap into perf.data. Size with idr_size
like jit_repipe_code_load() does.
Patch 5 - open list deadlock/race:
- 5/5 perf dso: Defer dropping the open list reference until after the lock
The reference taken by dso__list_add() cannot be dropped while
holding dso__data_open_lock: dso__put() may call dso__data_close()
which takes the same lock, deadlocking. This seems to be the cause
of the inconsistent list/counter state under REFCNT_CHECKING. Fix by
transferring the reference to a deferred node drained by
dso__put_deferred() after every unlock. Since the counter is now
decremented under the lock, do_open()'s close_first_dso() no longer
races with a stale count.
Regards,
- Arnaldo
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (5):
perf jitdump: Byte-swap debug entries via unaligned-safe accessors
perf genelf: Use unaligned-safe accessors for debug entries
perf jitdump: Free unwinding data even when eh_frame_hdr_size is zero
perf jitdump: Size code_move event allocation with idr_size
perf dso: Defer dropping the open list reference until after the lock
tools/perf/util/dso.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/genelf_debug.c | 30 ++++++++------
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c | 20 ++++++---
3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0