[RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest

From: Kiryl Shutsemau

Date: Thu Sep 03 2026 - 14:30:28 EST


From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>

Every way of dirtying part of a folio through a mapping ends up at
folio_mark_dirty(), which has no way to say which part changed, so
a_ops->dirty_folio() dirties all of it. A filesystem that tracks dirty
state per block then writes back the whole folio for a single stored
byte.

Add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and folio_mark_dirty_range() to pass the
range on. The new operation can express everything a_ops->dirty_folio()
can, so folio_mark_dirty() goes through it with a range covering the
folio and a filesystem needs only one of the two. Filesystems without it
dirty the whole folio.

Use it in folio_clear_dirty_for_io(), where the page table dirty bits
were being turned into a whole-folio dirty. It now collects them with
folio_mkclean_dirtymap() and hands the filesystem the runs that were
dirty. A folio that is not already dirty still dirties whole, because
the clean to dirty transition needs the accounting in folio_mark_dirty().

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
mm/page-writeback.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 072d8cd09a0b..1d98b6c0b880 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct address_space_operations {

/* Mark a folio dirty. Return true if this dirtied it */
bool (*dirty_folio)(struct address_space *, struct folio *);
+ /* Mark [off, off + len) of a folio dirty */
+ bool (*dirty_folio_range)(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);

void (*readahead)(struct readahead_control *);

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 87feaa5a2b78..7628262c17e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3337,6 +3337,7 @@ struct kvec;
struct page *get_dump_page(unsigned long addr, int *locked);

bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio);
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len);
bool folio_mark_dirty_lock(struct folio *folio);
bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 6c9c7ba89b8a..39b54c25a9fa 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2751,6 +2751,21 @@ bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_redirty_for_writepage);

+/*
+ * Hand a dirtied range of @folio to the filesystem. ->dirty_folio_range() can
+ * express everything ->dirty_folio() can, so a filesystem that implements it
+ * does not need both, and a whole-folio dirty comes through here as a range
+ * covering the folio.
+ */
+static bool mapping_dirty_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+ if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range)
+ return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+
+ return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+}
+
/**
* folio_mark_dirty - Mark a folio as being modified.
* @folio: The folio.
@@ -2782,13 +2797,39 @@ bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio)
*/
if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
- return mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+ return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, 0,
+ folio_size(folio));
}

return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_mark_dirty);

+/**
+ * folio_mark_dirty_range - Mark part of a folio as being modified.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @off: Offset of the modified range within the folio.
+ * @len: Length of the modified range.
+ *
+ * Like folio_mark_dirty(), but tells a filesystem that tracks dirty state per
+ * block that only [@off, @off + @len) changed, so writeback can skip the rest
+ * of the folio. Filesystems without that tracking dirty the whole folio.
+ *
+ * Return: True if the folio was newly dirtied, false if it was already dirty.
+ */
+bool folio_mark_dirty_range(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+
+ if (likely(mapping)) {
+ if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
+ folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
+ return mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio, off, len);
+ }
+
+ return noop_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
+}
+
/*
* folio_mark_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
* folio->mapping->host, and if the folio is unlocked. This is because another
@@ -2844,6 +2885,41 @@ void __folio_cancel_dirty(struct folio *folio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__folio_cancel_dirty);

+/*
+ * Write-protect every mapping of @folio and hand the filesystem the parts that
+ * were dirty in a page table.
+ *
+ * Without ->dirty_folio_range() there is nowhere to put per-block state, so
+ * any PTE dirty bit dirties the whole folio. Same when the folio is not
+ * already dirty, because then the dirty transition needs the full accounting
+ * in folio_mark_dirty(), and for a folio too large for the bitmap, which the
+ * page cache does not make.
+ */
+static void folio_mkclean_for_io(struct folio *folio,
+ struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
+ unsigned int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+ unsigned int start, end;
+
+ if (!mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio_range || !folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(nr > (1UL << MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER))) {
+ if (folio_mkclean(folio))
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bitmap_zero(map, nr);
+ if (!folio_mkclean_dirtymap(folio, map))
+ return;
+
+ for_each_set_bitrange(start, end, map, nr) {
+ mapping_dirty_range(mapping, folio,
+ (size_t)start << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (size_t)(end - start) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Clear a folio's dirty flag, while caring for dirty memory accounting.
* Returns true if the folio was previously dirty.
@@ -2875,9 +2951,9 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
*
* We use this sequence to make sure that
* (a) we account for dirty stats properly
- * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem to
- * mark the whole folio dirty if it was
- * dirty in a pagetable. Only to then
+ * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem which
+ * parts of the folio were dirty in a
+ * pagetable. Only to then
* (c) clean the folio again and return 1 to
* cause the writeback.
*
@@ -2895,8 +2971,7 @@ bool folio_clear_dirty_for_io(struct folio *folio)
* as a serialization point for all the different
* threads doing their things.
*/
- if (folio_mkclean(folio))
- folio_mark_dirty(folio);
+ folio_mkclean_for_io(folio, mapping);
/*
* We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
* installing a dirty pte and marking the folio dirty
--
2.54.0