Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86/mce: Fix timer list corruption and avoid redundant polling

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 03:41:27PM -0400, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> This series addresses two distinct issues within the x86 Machine Check
> Architecture (MCA) timer subsystem: a race condition during runtime CPU
> reconfiguration that can corrupt the kernel timer wheel, and redundant
> periodic software polling of banks that never log corrected errors.

N T Sep 01              Aaron Tomlin ( :2.6K|) [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Avoid arming periodic polling timer on isolated CPUs
N T Sep 01              Aaron Tomlin ( :2.3K|) [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/mce: Fix timer list corruption and avoid redundant polling
N T Sep 02              Aaron Tomlin ( :3.0K|) [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/mce: Fix timer list corruption and avoid redundant polling
N T Sep 03              Aaron Tomlin ( :3.1K|) [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/mce: Fix timer list corruption and avoid redundant polling
N T Sep 03              Aaron Tomlin ( :4.0K|) [PATCH v5 0/3] x86/mce: Fix timer list corruption and avoid redundant polling

5 submissions on the same topic in 3 days.

Please stop spamming!

From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

Don't get discouraged - or impatient
------------------------------------

After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.

Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You should
receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a minimum of
one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
busy times like merge windows.

Pls read the documentation about how you should work with the community:

Documentation/process/

while you're waiting for review.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette