Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] Ambarella CV75 SoC minimal bring-up
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Sep 04 2026 - 03:22:37 EST
On 04/09/2026 08:54, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On ven. 04 sept. 2026 at 14:38, Long Zhao via B4 Relay <devnull+longzhao.ambarella.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ambarella.yaml | 24 +
>> .../bindings/clock/ambarella,cv75-rct.yaml | 64 ++
>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/pl061-gpio.yaml | 32 +-
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 1 +
>> .../bindings/pinctrl/ambarella,cv75-pinctrl.yaml | 239 +++++++
>> .../bindings/serial/snps-dw-apb-uart.yaml | 1 +
>> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
>> MAINTAINERS | 14 +
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 6 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ambarella/Makefile | 3 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ambarella/cv75-evk.dts | 30 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ambarella/cv75.dtsi | 177 +++++
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/Kconfig | 13 +
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/Makefile | 6 +
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu-cv75.c | 296 ++++++++
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_common.c | 60 ++
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_common.h | 25 +
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_mux_div.c | 234 +++++++
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_mux_div.h | 35 +
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_pll.c | 421 ++++++++++++
>> drivers/clk/ambarella/ccu_pll.h | 70 ++
>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c | 342 +++++----
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c | 24 +-
>> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 15 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ambarella-cv75.c | 561 +++++++++++++++
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ambarella.c | 761 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ambarella.h | 50 ++
>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 34 +
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/ambarella,cv75-rct.h | 15 +
>> include/linux/amba/bus.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/gpio/regmap.h | 13 +
>> 37 files changed, 3439 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>
> That is a lot of stuff mixed into a single series that could easily split
Well, not easily, because each split patchset would rely on non-existing
CONFIG which could trigger warnings.
Contributors follow here the correct and documented process of new SoC
platform, I don't get why now only this patchset has to be split...
Best regards,
Krzysztof