Re: [PATCH v20 05/14] KVM: arm64: Set PSTATE.EXLOCK when entering an exception

From: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Date: Fri Sep 04 2026 - 09:49:06 EST


On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 10:47:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> As per DDI 0487 R_WTXBY we need to manage PSTATE.EXLOCK when entering an

I'm guessing this is the doc at this unreasonably huge URI? :)

https://support.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/mc/-Part-D-The-AArch64-System-Level-Architecture/-Chapter-D1-The-AArch64-System-Level-Programmers--Model/-D1-4-Exceptions/-D1-4-2-Exception-entry?lang=en#wtxby

> exception, when the exception is entered from a lower EL the bit is cleared
> while if entering from the same EL it is set to GCSCR_ELx.EXLOCKEN.
> Implement this behaviour in enter_exception64().

Ack, all makes sense and matches the doc.

>
> Reviewed-by: Yuan Yao <yaoyuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

All LGTM! A couple small nits but otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> index 15649a253a57..eed7f1226be6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> #define PSR_C_BIT 0x20000000
> #define PSR_Z_BIT 0x40000000
> #define PSR_N_BIT 0x80000000
> +#define PSR_EXLOCK_BIT 0x400000000

Ah yeah I see this matches BIT_ULL(34) /* PSTATE.EXLOCK */ in
emulate-nested.c (which you later replace with this :)

>
> #define PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT 10
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
> index 754e2dc1df54..85c873644fe9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,38 @@ static void __vcpu_write_spsr_und(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = val;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long compute_exlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned long mode,
> + unsigned long target_mode)
> +{
> + u64 gcscr;
> +
> + if (!kvm_has_gcs(kern_hyp_va(vcpu->kvm)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* GCS can't be enabled for 32 bit */
> + if (mode & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
> + return 0;

Ack makes sense.

> +
> + /* When taking an exception to a higher EL EXLOCK is cleared. */
> + if ((mode | PSR_MODE_THREAD_BIT) != target_mode)
> + return 0;

Ack makes sense as per doc.

> +
> + /*
> + * When taking an exception to the same EL EXLOCK is set to
> + * the effective value of GCSR_ELx.EXLOCKEN.

NIT: Typo? Other references to this here are for GCSCR_ELx.EXLOCKEN.

> + */
> + if (is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu))
> + gcscr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, GCSCR_EL2);

I guess with VHE this does the automagically 'think it's in EL2' even if
it's nested in EL1 stuff? :)

> + else
> + gcscr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, GCSCR_EL1);
> +
> + if (gcscr & GCSCR_ELx_EXLOCKEN)
> + return PSR_EXLOCK_BIT;

This all LGTM.

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This performs the exception entry at a given EL (@target_mode), stashing PC
> * and PSTATE into ELR and SPSR respectively, and compute the new PC/PSTATE.
> @@ -138,6 +170,11 @@ static void enter_exception64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long target_mode,
> // PSTATE.BTYPE is set to zero upon any exception to AArch64
> // See ARM DDI 0487E.a, pages D1-2293 to D1-2294.
>
> + // PSTATE.EXLOCK is set to 0 upon any exception to a higher
> + // EL, or to GCSCR_ELx.EXLOCKEN for an exception to the same
> + // exception level. See ARM DDI 0487 R_WTXBY.

Yeah confirmed:

"If FEAT_GCS is implemented, PSTATE.EXLOCK is updated based on the
following situations:

On taking an exception to the same Exception level, PSTATE.EXLOCK
is set to the Effective value of GCSCR_ELx.EXLOCKEN for the
current Exception level.

On taking an exception to a higher Exception level, PSTATE.EXLOCK
is set to 0."

A slight nit is that maybe the comment should live with compute_exlock()
but it's no big deal.

> + new |= compute_exlock(vcpu, mode, target_mode);
> +
> new |= PSR_D_BIT;
> new |= PSR_A_BIT;
> new |= PSR_I_BIT;
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo