Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: regulator: ROHM BD73800 regulators

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:04:15 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add bindings for the BUCKs and LDOs on ROHM BD73800. The PMIC state
> specific voltages can be set in same fashion as with a few other ROHM
> PMICs (for example with BD718[15,28,37,47,50,79]). Same properties are
> recycled :)
> 
> The LDOs 1 and 4 can use different voltage ranges depending on the OTP
> configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Revision history:
> v3:
>  - No changes
> v1 => v2:
>  - Description of the state specific voltages moved to own file and
>    referenced from it (because multiple PMIC bindings used them).
> 
> The dt checker's documentation reference checker warns about the link to
> the MFD binding - which will be introduced in next commit. These commits
> have kind of a chicken and egg issue as MFD is referencing regulator
> properties introduced in this patch.
> 
> I could squash these but IMO, this is clearer for the reviewers. AFAICS,
> Both MFD and regulator subsystems tend to be busy. I could also split
> adding the MFD comment reference to own patch which would be after the
> patch adding the MFD binding, but having own patch for just adding the
> comment is a bit meh.
> 
> So, I decided to live with the broken doc-link between these two
> patches.
> ---
>  .../regulator/rohm,bd73800-regulator.yaml     | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd73800-regulator.yaml
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>