Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/pruss-intc: Use scoped lock guard and devm_mutex_init
From: Radu Rendec
Date: Sat Sep 05 2026 - 12:01:29 EST
On Thu, 2026-09-03 at 13:52 -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Scoped locking simplifies the return path in a spot, and removes
> a couple lines in another couple spots. The devm mutex init will
> call mutex_destroy() for us on remove, which only really matters
> when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is set, but it is nice to do anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> index cc3a7c21c2904..5a3e9e5bccbea 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void pruss_intc_map(struct pruss_intc *intc, unsigned long hwirq)
> u8 ch, host, reg_idx;
> u32 val;
>
> - mutex_lock(&intc->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&intc->lock);
>
> intc->event_channel[hwirq].ref_count++;
>
> @@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ static void pruss_intc_map(struct pruss_intc *intc, unsigned long hwirq)
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "mapped system_event = %lu channel = %d host = %d",
> hwirq, ch, host);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&intc->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -224,7 +222,7 @@ static void pruss_intc_unmap(struct pruss_intc *intc, unsigned long hwirq)
> u8 ch, host, reg_idx;
> u32 val;
>
> - mutex_lock(&intc->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&intc->lock);
>
> ch = intc->event_channel[hwirq].value;
> host = intc->channel_host[ch].value;
> @@ -251,8 +249,6 @@ static void pruss_intc_unmap(struct pruss_intc *intc, unsigned long hwirq)
>
> dev_dbg(intc->dev, "unmapped system_event = %lu channel = %d host = %d\n",
> hwirq, ch, host);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&intc->lock);
> }
>
> static void pruss_intc_init(struct pruss_intc *intc)
> @@ -376,17 +372,15 @@ static int pruss_intc_validate_mapping(struct pruss_intc *intc, int event,
> int channel, int host)
> {
> struct device *dev = intc->dev;
> - int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&intc->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&intc->lock);
>
> /* check if sysevent already assigned */
> if (intc->event_channel[event].ref_count > 0 &&
> intc->event_channel[event].value != channel) {
> dev_err(dev, "event %d (req. ch %d) already assigned to channel %d\n",
> event, channel, intc->event_channel[event].value);
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - goto unlock;
> + return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> /* check if channel already assigned */
> @@ -394,16 +388,13 @@ static int pruss_intc_validate_mapping(struct pruss_intc *intc, int event,
> intc->channel_host[channel].value != host) {
> dev_err(dev, "channel %d (req. host %d) already assigned to host %d\n",
> channel, host, intc->channel_host[channel].value);
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - goto unlock;
> + return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> intc->event_channel[event].value = channel;
> intc->channel_host[channel].value = host;
>
> -unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&intc->lock);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -550,7 +541,9 @@ static int pruss_intc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pruss_intc_init(intc);
>
> - mutex_init(&intc->lock);
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &intc->lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> intc->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(dev_fwnode(dev), max_system_events,
> &pruss_intc_irq_domain_ops, intc);
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@xxxxxxxxxx>