RE: [PATCH] pinctrl: realtek: rtd1619b: Publish the OF module alias
From: Yu-Chun Lin [林祐君]
Date: Mon Sep 07 2026 - 02:15:37 EST
Hi,
> The RTD1619B pinctrl driver is a separate tristate object using
>
> rtd1619b_pinctrl_of_match. The generic Realtek pinctrl support does not
>
> publish an alias for this SoC module.
>
>
>
> Export the existing OF table while retaining the initialization order.
>
>
>
> Fixes: c7910f6aca56 ("pinctrl: realtek: Add pinctrl driver for RTD1619B")
>
> Signed-off-by: hpp.iscas <hppiscas@xxxxxxx>
>
Please use your real name.
> ---
>
> drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd1619b.c | 1 +
>
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd1619b.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd1619b.c
>
> index b07e50d..e03e1fb 100644
>
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd1619b.c
>
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd1619b.c
>
> @@ -1575,6 +1575,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> rtd1619b_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
>
> { .compatible = "realtek,rtd1619b-pinctrl", },
>
> {},
>
> };
>
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rtd1619b_pinctrl_of_match);
>
>
>
> static struct platform_driver rtd1619b_pinctrl_driver = {
>
> .driver = {
>
The code looks good to me, but 'git am' failed to apply the mbox.
I noticed =0D in your patch, which might be the reason it failed.
Best Regards,
Yu-Chun