Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Only apply cpufreq pressure where frequency is invariant

From: K Prateek Nayak

Date: Mon Sep 07 2026 - 04:47:26 EST


On 9/7/2026 1:37 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> So, I've been trying to understand these bits and looking at
> cpufreq_policy_init_qos(), the "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" should be the
> frequency including the boost range but I see cpufreq_update_pressure()
> and it says:
>
> max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> if (!max_freq)
> max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>
> capped_freq = policy->max;
>
> /*
> * Handle properly the boost frequencies, which should simply clean
> * the cpufreq pressure value.
> */
> if (max_freq <= capped_freq) {
> ...
> }
>
>
> Looking at this, I feel "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" should not include
> the boost frequency, or x86 should implement a arch_scale_freq_ref()
> to know when boost is enabled vs disabled.
>
> If cpufreq_update_pressure() indeed has to disregard boost frequency,
> and anything above P0 is not considered as pressure, we can simply
> do:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index b898b6544069..068e6d6e15a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2586,8 +2586,11 @@ static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> cpu = cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
> max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> - if (!max_freq)
> - max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + if (!max_freq) {
> + max_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
> + policy->max, policy->min,

My bad, that should have been other way around and use the cpuinfo
fields to prevent capping based on policy limits. Updated diff:

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b898b6544069..97f4a3ba5107 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2586,8 +2586,11 @@ static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)

cpu = cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
- if (!max_freq)
- max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+ if (!max_freq) {
+ max_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq,
+ CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ }

capped_freq = policy->max;

---

> + CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> + }
>
> capped_freq = policy->max;
>
> ---
>
> __resolve_freq() will cap "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" based on the freq_table
> entries if it exists (acpi-cpufreq), or otherwise return
> "policy->cpuinfo.max_freq" as is for drivers that uses CPPC based scaling
> (amd-pstate, intel_pstate).
>
> Thoughts?
>

--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek