Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] add kconfirm

[Nicolas Schier]

On Sun, Sep 06, 2026 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Julian Braha wrote:
> On 9/4/26 23:05, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> 
> > My apologies for not getting to this sooner, I have been busy with some
> > other projects. I will try to play around with this from a usability
> > perspective (which is what I am most concerned with at this point). If a
> > v5 is mostly prepared, I would not mind seeing it even if we want to go
> > the in-tree interpreter checks. One option is to take kconfirm into the
> > tree, fix up the warnings it generates, then moving the checks into the
> > interpreter directly while dropping them from kconfirm (since the tree
> > should be clean at that point). I am open to opinions on that though.
> > 
> 
> Your strategy makes sense to me. I'll send v5 then, but I'd also like to
> make sure that Nicolas is onboard with this idea.

I am fully ok with that.  Thanks!

Nicolas