Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/4] intel: fix typos in comments

[Randy Dunlap]

Hi,

On 9/7/26 2:54 AM, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> Comment typos across the Intel ethernet drivers, split per driver.  Found with scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
> misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Comments only, no code
> changes.
> 
> v1 went out with a bare [PATCH] and a "net:" subject prefix.  As
> maintainer-netdev.rst asks, v2 designates the patches to a tree, and
> each subject now names the component it touches instead of "net:".  The
> series is rebased onto that tree; the diff is unchanged.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260907064528.6602-1-hemanth.selam@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 
> Hemanth Selam (4):
>   i40e: fix typos in comments
>   ice: fix typos in comments
>   ixgbevf: fix typo "enble" in comment
>   Documentation/eth/intel: fix repeated words in comments
> 
>  Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/intel/i40e.rst | 2 +-
>  Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/intel/iavf.rst | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_common.c                   | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c                  | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h                            | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c                       | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c                      | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c               | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

How did you choose iwl-next as the target tree?

The closest match to that in the MAINTAINERS file is this:
INTEL WIRELESS WIFI LINK (iwlwifi)
M:	Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx>
L:	linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
S:	Supported
W:	https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi
T:	git https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-next.git/
F:	drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/

but the patches don't touch any of the Intel wifi drivers.

I expect that you want net-next there, but I could just be confuzed.

thanks.
-- 
~Randy