Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: pcs: rzn1-miic: Verify port number from dtb

[Andrew Lunn]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 08:39:27PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 7:55 PM Kyle Hendry via B4 Relay
> <devnull+khendry.reliablecontrols.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Kyle Hendry <khendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add check to make sure port number is in range before writing
> > to dt_val array
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle Hendry <khendry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/pcs/pcs-rzn1-miic.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-rzn1-miic.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-rzn1-miic.c
> > index c50b65d064fa..3ee40eb9d545 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-rzn1-miic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-rzn1-miic.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ static int miic_parse_dt(struct miic *miic, u32 *mode_cfg)
> >                 if (of_property_read_u32(conv, "reg", &port))
> >                         continue;
> >
> > +               if (port < miic->of_data->miic_port_start || port > miic->of_data->miic_port_max) {
> > +                       dev_err(miic->dev, "Port number out of range: %d\n", port);
> > +                       kfree(dt_val);
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +               }
> > +
> Query to maintainers, what policy should be followed? Since the
> dtbinding check complains if the port is out of range should the code
> also check it?

Yes, the kernel should check it. Running the checker is
optional. Crashing the kernel because of an invalid DT blob is not
something you want to allow.

	  Andrew