Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] mm/page_owner: Add PID/TGID/COMM and cgroup filtering

[Weijie Yuan]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 02:40:10PM +0800, zhen.ni wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2026/9/8 14:24, Weijie Yuan 写道:
> >  From an outsider..
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 10:41:23AM +0800, zhen.ni wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry but your whole reply reads like a LLM slop. It took a lot of
> > > > mental effor to actually try and engage with it.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This reply was written by me, and its viewpoints are not simply copied
> > > directly from an LLM. The LLM only assists with the wording.
> > 
> > So that's probably the reason. Your previous replies was indeed very
> > much like the output of an LLM. Even if the idea is your own, after
> > being "polished" by LLM, it's hard to read. I know English is not our
> > first language, and it's not that easy to speak like a native speaker.
> > But may I ask you did you read it before sending them out? I really
> > found this bunch of overly formal content a little painful to read.
> > 
> > So I suspect the LLM may have taken too much liberty in polishing your
> > text, to the point that your replies no longer read like something a
> > person would naturally write.
> > 
> > The "Summary and Plan" in your reply in v1, both in its formatting and
> > wording, looks quite similar to LLM-generated text to me. So I can
> > understand why Lorenzo asked whether you had used an LLM. Come on, we
> > all know what LLM writing looks like.
> > 
> > That said, I do not know exactly how you used the LLM on your original
> > text, so please forgive me if I have this wrong.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> I really can't distinguish the LLM flavor that clearly in English.

Yes, sometimes I can not as well. But I guess the native ones can.
So.. ;-)

> I'm sorry for causing some trouble.

That's fine. No need to say sorry.

I know and understand that we non-native speakers would rather not make
mistakes over these little language detail issues. But over-polishing
can end up having the opposite effect. Keeping some of your natural
writing style may actually be what the community prefers, especially
these AI days.

> My normal reply process is to first describe my ideas, then have the
> LLM check for logic and grammar issues, and do a round of polishing. I
> check the final draft once more to see if it has deviated from my
> ideas, and make corresponding revisions.

Sigh, so it is hard to know where to draw the line. Write more and learn
more about "human-like" writing, perhaps. :)

Thanks!