Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Use "er" asm constriant for add/sub

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 08:32:16PM -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 11:14:44PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I went ahead and picked these up on
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git ib-iio-x86-asm-fix-7.3
> > and merged that into the main IIO branch. I want to give plenty of time in next
> > for the driver that was relying on them.
> > 
> > Currently this is all in my testing branch but I'll push that out as a non rebasing
> > (ideally) branch a bit later in the week.
> 
> No, this is not how this works. x86 changes go through tip and if you need an
> immutable branch, we can give you a tag.

While x86 usually goes through tip and none of the x86 maintainers
commented before Jonathan applied, it got positive feedback from hpa and
peterz a month ago and iio depends on it.

So I suggest to do the practical thing and pull Jonathan's branch into
tip. Technically that doesn't make a difference (apart from maybe branch
vs tag preferences).

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature