Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadloop in f2fs_fsync_node_pages()

From: Zhiguo Niu

Date: Tue Sep 08 2026 - 21:17:01 EST


Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
于2026年8月24日周一 21:19写道:
>
> There is potential deadloop in race condition:
>
> Thread A Thread B
> - fsync
> - f2fs_do_sync_file
> - f2fs_fsync_node_pages
> - last_fsync_dnode
> - folio_get(last_folio)
> - f2fs_setattr
> - f2fs_truncate
> - f2fs_truncate_blocks
> - f2fs_do_truncate_blocks
> - f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks
> - truncate_dnode
> - truncate_node
> - invalidate_mapping_pages
> - folio->mapping = NULL
> - is_node_folio alwasy return false
> - atomic && !marked is always true,
> then goto retry
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 608514deba38 ("f2fs: set fsync mark only for the last dnode")
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 968e5ed38816..86c2e67e43b6 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -2016,6 +2016,11 @@ int f2fs_fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
> f2fs_debug(sbi, "Retry to write fsync mark: ino=%u, idx=%lx",
> ino, last_folio->index);
> folio_lock(last_folio);
> + if (unlikely(!is_node_folio(last_folio))) {
Hi Chao,
is_node_folio->NODE_MAPPING(F2FS_F_SB(folio))->F2FS_M_SB(folio->mappping)->F2FS_I_SB(mapping->host)
if mapping==NULL, panic will occur here?
just like commit msg in mai: "f2fs: parameterize node helpers and macros"
thanks!

> + f2fs_folio_put(last_folio, true);
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out;
> + }
> f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(last_folio, NODE, true, true);
> folio_mark_dirty(last_folio);
> folio_unlock(last_folio);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel