Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk/stop_machine: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs a stopper callback
From: Petr Mladek
Date: Wed Sep 09 2026 - 06:16:42 EST
On Fri 2026-08-28 15:36:48, Aditya Chillara wrote:
> On 8/28/2026 2:24 PM, John Ogness wrote:
> > Hi Aditya,
> >
> > On 2026-08-27, Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> A device using a legacy UART console (console=ttyMSM0,115200n8) hit a
> >> watchdog bark/bite about 40 seconds after boot.
> >>
> >> stop_machine() (used here for kprobe text patching) stops every CPU by
> >> running multi_cpu_stop() on each of them, through the per-CPU
> >> "migration/%u" threads. These threads run at a higher priority than the
> >> msm_watchdog thread. At bite time, all eight CPUs were still spinning in
> >> multi_cpu_stop()'s MULTI_STOP_PREPARE state, where interrupts are left
> >> enabled.
> >>
> >> Heavy SELinux denial logging had built up a large backlog on the
> >> console. One CPU took an interrupt while spinning in MULTI_STOP_PREPARE.
> >> Handling it eventually led to a printk(), and because the console was a
> >> legacy console, that printk() synchronously drained the whole backlog
> >> over the slow UART. While the drain was still running, the watchdog bark
> >> interrupt hit the same CPU, found no recent pet, and escalated to a
> >> bite.
> >>
> >> The captured stack for that CPU, innermost frame first:
> >>
> >> qcom_soc_set_wdt_bite
> >> qcom_wdt_bark_handler
> >> __handle_irq_event_percpu
> >> handle_irq_event
> >> handle_fasteoi_irq
> >> generic_handle_domain_irq
> >> gic_handle_irq
> >> do_interrupt_handler
> >> el1_interrupt
> >> el1h_64_irq_handler
> >> el1h_64_irq
> >> console_flush_all
> >> console_unlock
> >> vprintk_emit
> >> dev_vprintk_emit
> >> dev_printk_emit
> >> __dev_printk
> >> _dev_err
> >> btspi_sleep_timeout_handler
> >> call_timer_fn
> >> __run_timer_base
> >> run_timer_softirq
> >> handle_softirqs
> >> __do_softirq
> >> ____do_softirq
> >> call_on_irq_stack
> >> do_softirq_own_stack
> >> __irq_exit_rcu
> >> irq_exit_rcu
> >> el1_interrupt
> >> el1h_64_irq_handler
> >> el1h_64_irq
> >> multi_cpu_stop
> >> cpu_stopper_thread
> >> smpboot_thread_fn
> >> kthread
> >> ret_from_fork
> >>
> >> Every other CPU stayed parked in the rendezvous the whole time, since
> >> their stopper threads outrank msm_watchdog. Nothing could pet the
> >> watchdog until the drain finished.
> >>
> >> This was observed through multi_cpu_stop(), but the hazard is not
> >> specific to it. Every cpu stopper callback runs in stop_sched_class,
> >> above msm_watchdog and every other thread on the CPU, so a slow flush
> >> from any of them (including single-CPU callbacks such as the migration
> >> and task-migration stoppers) can starve the watchdog just as well. The
> >> fix therefore covers all stopper callbacks, not only multi_cpu_stop().
> >>
> >> Fix this by having the cpu stopper mark the CPU active while a callback
> >> runs, and having printk use that marker to defer legacy console flushes
> >> until the callback returns:
> >>
> >> 1/2 stop_machine: Track when a CPU executes a stopper callback
> >>
> >> Add a per-CPU flag, set in the stopper dispatch path around the
> >> callback, and an in_cpu_stop() accessor.
> >>
> >> 2/2 printk: Defer legacy console flushes while a CPU runs a stopper callback
> >>
> >> Route legacy console output through the offload path instead of
> >> flushing it directly while a CPU is inside a stopper callback, and
> >> flush it once the callback returns. Emergency and panic output is
> >> unaffected.
> >>
> >> Reproduced and verified with an out-of-tree test module that triggers
> >> stop_machine() with a queued console backlog and a printk() inside the
> >> rendezvous, paired with a kprobe-based script that flags any console
> >> flush happening while a CPU is inside a stopper callback.
> >
> > Generally speaking, we are not taking the whack-a-mole approach to
> > workaround all the known legacy console problems (there are a lot of
> > them!). However, if there are problems that occur during normal usage
> > (as opposed to crafted tests), then we can insert workarounds.
> >
> > For workarounds of known legacy console problems we have the deferred
> > enter/exit functions. These only affect legacy consoles and literally
> > exist for these purposes. I would expect the following patch would also
> > solve your problem.
>
> Yes, this fixes the issue.
>
> >
> > John Ogness
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > index d085ba1f4b44e..31f7af41249f1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > @@ -507,7 +507,9 @@ static void cpu_stopper_thread(unsigned int cpu)
> > stopper->caller = work->caller;
> > stopper->fn = fn;
> > preempt_count_inc();
> > + printk_deferred_enter();
> > ret = fn(arg);
> > + printk_deferred_exit();
> > if (done) {
> > if (ret)
> > done->ret = ret;
>
> Tested-by: Aditya Chillara <aditya.chillara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John, are you going to send it as a proper patch, please?
Or would you prefer Aditya to do it?
Best Regards,
Petr