Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: dts: draeger: Add socfpga devicetree for Draeger's M48 board.

[Dinh Nguyen]

Hi Petko,

On 9/9/26 06:15, Petko Manolov wrote:
> Adding the device trees for “Dräger M48 on NXP i.MX6 (Q) and Intel/Altera
> SoCFPGA Cyclone V” board variant.  It has both (the SoC and FPGA) on the same
> carrier and they are cross-monitoring each other.
>
> This is the SoCFPGA devicetree part.
>
> Changes in v3:
>
>    - add Draeger AG in devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
>    - separate binding changes from the actual devicetree patch
>    - remove "earlyprintk" from the boot arguments
>
> Petko Manolov (3):
>    Add Draeger AG as a vendor
>    Add Draeger's M48 board to the SoCFPGA family.
>    Add socfpga devicetree for Draeger's M48 board.
>
>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml       |   1 +
>   .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/intel/socfpga/Makefile      |   1 +
>   .../socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5_draeger_m48.dts  | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/intel/socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5_draeger_m48.dts

Please look up what a commit header and message should look like for 
these patches. For example:

patch 1/3 should look something like this:

dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add Draeger AG

Add a vendor prefix for Draegar AG, which is Draegerwerk AG & Co. KGaA

Signed-off-by: Petko Manolov <petko.manolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

You should look what the formatting of the commit header and message 
look like for the subsystem you're submitting patches to.

All of your patches are missing the appropriate formatting.

Dinh