[PATCH] writeback: report a Tasks-RCU quiescent state per cgwb drain pass
From: Josef Bacik
Date: Wed Sep 09 2026 - 14:40:07 EST
cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn() drains a dying cgwb by calling
cleanup_offline_cgwb() until it returns false, with a cond_resched()
between passes. On a CONFIG_PREEMPTION kernel that cond_resched() does
nothing: _cond_resched() is a plain "return 0", and under
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC the full and lazy modes disable it. Since commit
7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") those are
the only two models on the architectures with PREEMPT_LAZY support,
arm64 and x86 among them, so the drain loop never reports a Tasks-RCU
quiescent state.
A worker draining a cgwb with millions of attached inodes runs for
minutes. On a 6.18 arm64 host in lazy mode the cgwb worker drained one
dying cgroup's writeback domain for over 11 minutes. A BPF program
unlink (bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog -> bpf_trampoline_update ->
unregister_ftrace_direct -> ftrace_shutdown -> synchronize_rcu_tasks())
waited on that grace period while holding the trampoline mutex, 42
tasks queued behind it in D state, and the hung task detector fired at
614 s and panicked the host. Any BPF or ftrace detach during a long
drain inherits the drain's length.
Fix this by calling cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() so we do not stall out
anybody who calls sycnrhonize_rcu_tasks(). We put this in a do { } while
loop because if we have many small cgroups cleanup_offline_cgwb() will
return false and we will never call cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), creating
the same problem.
Fixes: c22d70a162d3 ("writeback, cgroup: release dying cgwbs by switching attached inodes")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9d444098-7c03-4163-af12-bd0a79a51443@paulmck-laptop/
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/backing-dev.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index cecbcf9060a6..18e999053bae 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -910,8 +910,9 @@ static void cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
continue;
spin_unlock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
- while (cleanup_offline_cgwb(wb))
- cond_resched();
+ do {
+ cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
+ } while (cleanup_offline_cgwb(wb));
spin_lock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
wb_put(wb);
---
base-commit: 893e11787f78e43b534e252249ac3fff4d1333f8
change-id: 20260909-cgwb-tasks-rcu-qs-42341609f3e1
Best regards,
--
Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>