Re: [PATCH] sh: mach-rsk: rsk7203: avoid using inline compound literals

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 09:51:22AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 8:59 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2026-08-11 at 08:52 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 12:05 AM Linus Walleij <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1. (easiest): tell me to just revert this out of my tree.
> > > >  Deal with this whole ordeal later.
> > >
> > > The merge window is coming up and I can't send a broken tree
> > > to Linus so I went with this option now.
> > >
> > > John: the patches are all yours, I have dropped them from my
> > > tree.
> >
> > OK, I will pick them up this week. My workload has settled a bit, so that
> > I have some time for kernel stuff again.
> >
> > Did you revert Dmitry's patches in the kernel as well?
> 
> I took out these:
> 106dc49414c4 sh: mach-rsk: rsk7203: convert pin configuration to using
> software nodes
> c5b962b6023d pinctrl: renesas: gpio: support software nodes for function GPIOs
> 6905cdac0e51 sh: mach-rsk: rsk7203: use static device properties for
> LEDs and GPIO buttons
> 62067bc0a083 sh: pfc: attach software node to the GPIO chip
> 4c870bbaba1b pinctrl: renesas: gpio: isolate function gpiochip from
> parent fwnode
> 
> I have added my review tag to 4c870bbaba1b and c5b962b6023d
> so you can just apply them to the SH tree. They don't conflict with
> anything, at least not this merge window, so you can safely queue them.

So can this be applied please?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry