Re: [PATCH] cxl/events: Return IRQ_NONE when no event is pending
From: Shaikh Kamaluddin
Date: Wed Sep 09 2026 - 15:40:10 EST
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 11:22:09AM -0700, Anisa Su wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2026 at 09:27:05PM +0530, Shaikh Kamaluddin wrote:
> > CXL event interrupts may share an MSI/MSI-X vector with other event
> > logs or device features. Consequently, cxl_event_thread() is registered
> > with IRQF_SHARED and must determine whether an interrupt belongs to the
> > event-log facility.
> >
> > The handler masks the Device Event Status register to the event logs
> > supported by the driver. However, when no supported status bit is set,
> > it exits the processing loop and still returns IRQ_HANDLED.
> >
> > Track whether at least one supported event status bit was observed.
> > Return IRQ_NONE when there was no event to service, while continuing to
> > return IRQ_HANDLED after processing one or more event logs.
> >
> > Fixes: a49aa8141b65 ("cxl/mem: Wire up event interrupts")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hello,
>
> This looks similar to a patch I sent last week:
> [PATCH v2 4/4] cxl/events: Return IRQ_NONE when no events were processed
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/8e22c1c2-8098-492a-8162-3dd27507c853@xxxxxxx/T/#ma4cf2b2dddaeebc06cb73f81647817bdbb51963c
>
> It was dropped because I received the feedback that in general, the driver does
> not need to handle device-side errors/spec-violating behaviors. I believe it
> would apply here as well. But if I misunderstood the intent of this patch,
> let me know.
>
Hi Anisa,
Thanks for pointing this out. I came across your v2 patch 4 only after I
had sent my patch.
Your patch 4 is based on the preceding robustness changes in the series.
By that point, cxl_event_thread() has been changed from the original
do-while loop to a while (mask) loop, and
cxl_mem_get_event_records() reports both an error return and the set of
drained logs. The handler also uses the drained and stuck masks to
control further retries.
My patch leaves the existing event-record retrieval and do-while loop
unchanged. It only tracks whether a supported event-status bit was
observed and uses that information to select IRQ_HANDLED or IRQ_NONE.
It therefore does not change the handling of mailbox errors, undrained
logs, or retry behavior.
The handled tracking in both cases addresses the same zero-status
shared-vector case. My motivation was its effect on generic IRQ
spurious-interrupt detection. Jonathan agreed that this is a cleanup
rather than an interrupt-loss fix, so the Fixes tag should be dropped.
Since your patch was posted first, would you like to repost the IRQ
return change as a standalone cleanup? If so, I am happy to step back.
If you no longer plan to pursue it, I can continue with a v2
incorporating the review feedback.
Please let me know which you prefer.
Thanks,
Shaikh
> Thanks,
> Anisa
> > ---
> > drivers/cxl/pci.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index c7c91e8dc51d..8b560cae91f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_event_thread(int irq, void *id)
> > struct cxl_dev_id *dev_id = id;
> > struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = dev_id->cxlds;
> > struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlds);
> > + bool handled = false;
> > u32 status;
> >
> > do {
> > @@ -527,11 +528,13 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_event_thread(int irq, void *id)
> > status &= CXLDEV_EVENT_STATUS_ALL;
> > if (!status)
> > break;
> > +
> > + handled = true;
> > cxl_mem_get_event_records(mds, status);
> > cond_resched();
> > } while (status);
> >
> > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > + return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> > }
> >
> > static int cxl_event_req_irq(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u8 setting)
> >
> > base-commit: 7098e9cd98a05c0c5de2fae0c2465f9d966fdd07
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 92e40cd60a697020faac475dcc77ba63b33434ea
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 10027ad5d9aed85806047f807b3a76273b6c4a77
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >