Re: [PATCH] ext4: cap migration extent length at EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN

From: Jan Kara

Date: Thu Sep 10 2026 - 06:32:22 EST


On Thu 10-09-26 11:40:00, Yichong Chen wrote:
> update_extent_range() keeps merging physically and logically contiguous
> blocks without limiting the accumulated range. The maximum length of an
> initialized extent is EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN, because the MSB of the 16-bit
> ee_len field is used to mark unwritten extents.
>
> finish_range() can therefore store a range longer than EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN
> in ee_len. A range of 32769 blocks is stored as 0x8001, which
> ext4_ext_is_unwritten() treats as an unwritten extent and
> ext4_ext_get_actual_len() reports as 1 block, so the migrated file
> silently loses its data.
>
> Stop merging once the accumulated range reaches EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN, so
> migration creates several valid extents instead.

Yeah, or the extent length could overflow the u16 type. The fix looks good.
Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Honza


>
> Fixes: c14c6fd5c56a ("ext4: Add EXT4_IOC_MIGRATE ioctl")
> Signed-off-by: Yichong Chen <chenyichong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/migrate.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/migrate.c b/fs/ext4/migrate.c
> index d467b5a13c62..2aa6572088cf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/migrate.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/migrate.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ static int update_extent_range(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> */
> if (lb->first_pblock &&
> (lb->last_pblock+1 == pblock) &&
> - (lb->last_block+1 == lb->curr_block)) {
> + (lb->last_block+1 == lb->curr_block) &&
> + (lb->last_block - lb->first_block + 1 < EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN)) {
> lb->last_pblock = pblock;
> lb->last_block = lb->curr_block;
> lb->curr_block++;
> --
> 2.51.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR