[PATCH v2 4/4] sched/numa: do not let VMA PID activity gate promotion
From: Gregory Price
Date: Thu Sep 10 2026 - 20:24:27 EST
From: "Gregory Price (Meta)" <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Commit fc137c0ddab2 ("sched/numa: enhance vma scanning logic")
skips VMAs without recent PID activity. Since only NUMA hint faults record
that activity, the filter can suppress the fault needed to promote hot
slow-tier memory.
In tiering mode, scan PID-inactive VMAs using promotion-only scans.
Reevaluate this choice whenever the scanner visits a VMA and pass it with
each protection walk.
Record socket-placement scans in prev_placement_scan_seq. Promotion-only
scans still update prev_scan_seq, but no longer postpone the starvation
fallback for placement scans.
On a host with 768 GB of DRAM and 256 GB of CXL memory running two roughly
430 GB database workloads, a large shmem VMA occupied each scan while 2,537
other VMAs covering 84 GB were skipped as inactive. A hot 20 GB hash table
remained entirely on CXL before this change and was split evenly between
DRAM and CXL afterwards.
Fixes: fc137c0ddab2 ("sched/numa: enhance vma scanning logic")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 7 ++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 5413bd10fff2..9f042d6ad465 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -803,6 +803,13 @@ struct vma_numab_state {
* A VMA is not eligible for scanning if prev_scan_seq == numa_scan_seq
*/
int prev_scan_seq;
+
+ /*
+ * MM scan sequence ID when the VMA was last scanned for placement.
+ * The starvation horizon in vma_is_accessed() counts against this, so
+ * promotion-only scans cannot postpone placement indefinitely.
+ */
+ int prev_placement_scan_seq;
};
#ifdef __HAVE_PFNMAP_TRACKING
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e636e8de53f1..6d1da13a2ef5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4085,6 +4085,10 @@ static void reset_ptenuma_scan(struct task_struct *p)
p->mm->numa_scan_offset = 0;
}
+/*
+ * Decide whether this VMA should be sampled for NUMA placement. In addition
+ * to recent accesses, periodically allow a scan to avoid starvation.
+ */
static bool vma_is_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
unsigned long pids;
@@ -4101,22 +4105,13 @@ static bool vma_is_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
if (test_bit(hash_32(current->pid, ilog2(BITS_PER_LONG)), &pids))
return true;
- /*
- * Complete a scan that has already started regardless of PID access, or
- * some VMAs may never be scanned in multi-threaded applications:
- */
- if (mm->numa_scan_offset > vma->vm_start) {
- trace_sched_skip_vma_numa(mm, vma, NUMAB_SKIP_IGNORE_PID);
- return true;
- }
-
/*
* This vma has not been accessed for a while, and if the number
* the threads in the same process is low, which means no other
* threads can help scan this vma, force a vma scan.
*/
if (READ_ONCE(mm->numa_scan_seq) >
- (vma->numab_state->prev_scan_seq + get_nr_threads(current)))
+ (vma->numab_state->prev_placement_scan_seq + get_nr_threads(current)))
return true;
return false;
@@ -4142,7 +4137,7 @@ static void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
unsigned int numab_mode = READ_ONCE(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode);
bool vma_pids_skipped;
bool vma_pids_forced = false;
- bool promo_only;
+ bool accessed, scan_started, promo_only;
WARN_ON_ONCE(p != container_of(work, struct task_struct, numa_work));
@@ -4278,6 +4273,7 @@ static void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
* first scan:
*/
vma->numab_state->prev_scan_seq = mm->numa_scan_seq - 1;
+ vma->numab_state->prev_placement_scan_seq = mm->numa_scan_seq - 1;
}
/*
@@ -4307,17 +4303,30 @@ static void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
}
/*
- * Do not scan the VMA if task has not accessed it, unless no other
- * VMA candidate exists.
+ * The PID filter must not gate promotion. Scan PID-inactive
+ * VMAs in tiering mode using promotion-only scans.
*/
- if (!vma_pids_forced && !vma_is_accessed(mm, vma)) {
+ accessed = vma_is_accessed(mm, vma);
+ scan_started = mm->numa_scan_offset > vma->vm_start;
+
+ if (!vma_pids_forced && !accessed && !scan_started &&
+ !(numab_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING)) {
vma_pids_skipped = true;
trace_sched_skip_vma_numa(mm, vma, NUMAB_SKIP_PID_INACTIVE);
continue;
}
+ if (!vma_pids_forced && !accessed &&
+ !(numab_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) &&
+ scan_started)
+ trace_sched_skip_vma_numa(mm, vma, NUMAB_SKIP_IGNORE_PID);
+ /*
+ * In combined mode, only VMAs the task uses need placement
+ * samples. Without tiering, every VMA reaching here does.
+ */
promo_only = !(numab_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) ||
- vma_is_ro_file(vma);
+ ((numab_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) &&
+ !accessed) || vma_is_ro_file(vma);
do {
start = max(start, vma->vm_start);
@@ -4345,8 +4354,15 @@ static void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
cond_resched();
} while (end != vma->vm_end);
- /* VMA scan is complete, do not scan until next sequence. */
+ /*
+ * VMA scan is complete, do not scan until next sequence. A
+ * promotion-only scan reached the end of the VMA but did not
+ * sample placement, so it does not count towards the starvation
+ * horizon in vma_is_accessed().
+ */
vma->numab_state->prev_scan_seq = mm->numa_scan_seq;
+ if (!promo_only)
+ vma->numab_state->prev_placement_scan_seq = mm->numa_scan_seq;
/*
* Only force scan within one VMA at a time, to limit the
--
2.55.0