Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] proc/task_mmu: remove unnecessary helpers

[Suren Baghdasaryan]

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 2:58 PM David Hildenbrand (Arm)
<david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/11/26 16:28, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 3:52 AM David Hildenbrand (Arm)
> > <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/11/26 01:47, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> >>> When per-vma locks were behind a config option, a number of helper
> >>> functions were needed to simplify the locking code. Now that these
> >>> locks are universally available, we can do a little cleanup.
> >>> Remove lock_vma_range(), unlock_vma_range(), query_vma_setup(),
> >>> query_vma_teardown() helpers.
> >>>
> >>> No functional change intended.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett (Oracle) <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> I think you CCed me only on this mail correctly (the other ones went to my old
> >> RH address, I thought that one would bounce)
> >
> > Oh, man! I used an old list of recipients :/
> > Should I resend to avoid bounces? So far I haven't seen any bounces
> > even from the previous version which also used the RH address.
>
> Odd, I thought it bounced for a while (maybe it has a new proud owner, who
> knows, haha).
>
> I changed Monday my mail filters to not catch to/bc to the RH address when also
> CCing a mailing list ... assuming everybody got annoyed of the bounces.
>
> I just reverted that change, so I'll just fish the mails out of the mailing list
> folder and should also get replies to the other mails into my inbox.

Sorry about that. I updated all my old recipient lists now. I thought
I did that before but apparently only for Lorenzo :)

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David