Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Modify the CMD1 transmission interval

[Ulf Hansson]

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 4:45 AM 李晓洁 (Xiaojie Li/13233)
<xiaojie.li2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Uffe:
>         Thank you for your reply.
>         However, I noticed that __mmc_poll_for_busy() and mmc_poll_for_busy() are invoked either directly or indirectly by many other functions within the MMC driver.
> Modifying them directly could potentially introduce unintended side effects.
>
>         Would it be acceptable to implement a dedicated function specifically for CMD1? We could create a CMD1-specific variant based on the existing __mmc_poll_for_busy().
> This approach would significantly minimize the potential impact on the rest of the codebase.

No, that's the whole point. We don't want open coded polling loops,
it's just a nightmare to maintain. Please try to extend the existing
__mmc_poll_for_busy() instead.

And next time, please don't top post.

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe