[PATCH v2 0/2] mm: stop calling pmd_folio() on special PMDs

From: Gregory Price

Date: Fri Sep 11 2026 - 23:48:47 EST


Two page table walkers resolve the folio behind a PMD with pmd_folio(),
which is only valid for a PMD mapping a refcounted struct page:

madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() mm/madvise.c
queue_folios_pmd() mm/mempolicy.c

vmf_insert_pfn_pmd() installs special PMDs holding a raw pfn that need not
have a memmap entry at all. Both walkers can reach one and fault on the
first folio field read. The PTE halves of both already use
vm_normal_folio(); these two patches make the PMD halves match.

The four callers of vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(), and which walker each reaches:

drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c VM_PFNMAP mempolicy
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c VM_PFNMAP mempolicy
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c VM_PFNMAP mempolicy
drivers/hv/mshv_vtl_main.c VM_MIXEDMAP both

can_madv_lru_vma() rejects VM_PFNMAP, so only mshv_vtl_low reaches the
madvise walker, and that needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN. queue_pages_walk_ops
supplies its own ->test_walk, so walk_page_test()'s generic VM_PFNMAP skip
never runs and vfio-pci is reachable by any process holding the device fd.
Hence the different stable tags.

One behaviour change: mbind(MPOL_MF_STRICT) over a PMD mapped VM_PFNMAP
region now returns 0 rather than -EIO. The PTE loop already returned 0
there. drm_gem_shmem and panthor are where this is observable, since they
PMD map pages that do have a memmap entry and so never faulted.

Reproducer
==========

No hardware needed. An out of tree module stands in for the drivers above:
three misc devices, each with a ->huge_fault calling vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(),
plus VM_HUGEPAGE so the fault path takes the PMD branch.

/dev/pmdspec_mixed VM_MIXEDMAP, pfn at the 1 TiB mark, no memmap
/dev/pmdspec_pfnmap VM_PFNMAP, pfn at the 1 TiB mark, no memmap
/dev/pmdspec_real VM_PFNMAP, real alloc_pages(PMD_ORDER) on node 0

Userspace maps the device into a PMD aligned window, reads one byte to
fault the PMD in, checks a module parameter to confirm it went in, then
issues the operation.

vng --run <bzImage> --user root --memory 4G --verbose \
--append "numa=fake=2" \
--exec "insmod pmdspec.ko && ./pmdspec_test <subtest>"

numa=fake=2 gives a node 1 to bind to; the module allocates its real page
on node 0, which is what makes queue_folio_required() true.

subtest operation parent series
--------------------------------------------------------------------
madv_cold madvise(MADV_COLD) oops ret=0
madv_pageout madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT) oops ret=0
mbind_mixed mbind(MPOL_BIND, n1, MPOL_MF_MOVE) oops ret=0
mbind_pfnmap mbind(MPOL_BIND, n1, MPOL_MF_STRICT) oops ret=0
mbind_real mbind(MPOL_BIND, n1, MPOL_MF_STRICT) -EIO ret=0

Two things the table shows that are easy to miss in the code:

- mbind_mixed passes only MPOL_MF_MOVE. MPOL_MF_STRICT is not needed for
a VM_MIXEDMAP vma: walk_page_test() only skips VM_PFNMAP, and
vma_migratable() is true for VM_MIXEDMAP.

- mbind_real demonstrates the user visible change (-EIO -> 0)

Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817220810.1175596-1-gourry%40gourry.net
Assisted-by: LLM

---
v2: improvements from David

Gregory Price (2):
mm/mempolicy: use vm_normal_folio_pmd() in queue_folios_pmd()
mm/madvise: use vm_normal_folio_pmd() in cold/pageout PMD range

mm/madvise.c | 7 +++----
mm/mempolicy.c | 16 +++++++++-------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--
2.55.0