Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] x86/msr: Simplify some rdmsrq() use cases
From: Jürgen Groß
Date: Sat Sep 12 2026 - 02:50:30 EST
On 11.09.26 23:33, Shreshth Srivastava wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I'm working on a v3 of Dave's "x86/msr: Consolidate native/paravirt MSR
functions" series on top of yours, so I tried testing this patch.
You should look at [1] and [2] as well.
While I'm here: you mentioned you'd send a V3 after rc1 if conflicts
turned up. Is that still the plan? I wasn't sure whether to base on v2
plus the respins of 4 and 13, or wait.
I did send out V3 yesterday [3].
Most of the code this touches can't run on my box, so I compared compiled
output instead. Built patches 1-12, then 1-13, with the same .config and
compiler, and diffed "objdump -d" output for every .o in both trees. All
9396 objects came out identical. The 1-13 kernel boots fine under KVM.
Only tried the one config: x86_64, gcc 11.5.0,
CPU_SUP_{INTEL,AMD,ZHAOXIN}=y, HYPERV=y, KVM_INTEL=y, KVM_INTEL_TDX=y.
Tested-by: Shreshth Srivastava <shreshth.srivastava@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
Juergen
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260911075216.3142309-1-jgross@xxxxxxxx/T/#t
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260911084211.3149957-1-jgross@xxxxxxxx/T/#t
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260911074530.3140830-1-jgross@xxxxxxxx/T/#t
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature