Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] ath1{1,2}k: support multiple PCI devices in one system

[Juha-Matti Tilli]

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026, at 22:15, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 9/8/2026 2:31 AM, Juha-Matti Tilli wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > As you may well know, multiple identical ath11k and ath12k devices are
> > not supported in a single Linux host because they use conflicting QRTR
> > node IDs. Fortunately, Denis Kenzior created a patchset to support
> > multiple QRTR endpoints with identical node IDs, and Mihai Moldovan
> > refined it, after which I took over the patchset and refined it more.
> > 
> > [snip]
> 
> How are you populating the list of recipients for your e-mail?
> 
> You are including folks no longer involved in kernel development, but more
> importantly, you are using an obsolete e-mail address for the MHI maintainer
> (Mani). I've replaced his address in my reply.
> 
> Please make sure to use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get an accurate list of
> recipients.

Hello,

I will post a new patchset without messed-up threading later. The e-mail
list was populated from Mihai's patchset from 2024, and I indeed noticed 
that Mani's e-mail address was old, which would have been fixed in the
next version anyway. I will also do an estimate of how recently the
recipients have been doing kernel development, based on the Linux kernel
commit history, and what kind of development they have done (in what
subsystems), and remove addresses that haven't been part of relevant
kernel subsystem development recently (except maybe Denis and Mihai
could be listed as the patches were originally theirs). Of course,
get_maintainer.pl result will be included.

I will also join the modified recipient lists of Denis's patchset and
Mihai's patchset, as they are related to each other, and Mihai's patches
require Denis's patches.

I hope that with these modifications, the patchsets could be taken into
consideration and review.

At least my git send-email settings and changed SMTP server settings
should prevent the previous mistake in the next series, and if not, now
I know --in-reply-to and --no-thread. Also shorter CC list will make SMTP
server limits less likely.

BR, Juha-Matti