Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] rust: workqueue: add ScopedQueue for lifetime bound items

From: Onur Özkan

Date: Sat Sep 12 2026 - 04:00:54 EST


On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:40:51 +0000
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 06:52:48PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > From: Onur Özkan <work@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add a workqueue wrapper for work items that are not 'static.
> >
> > Tyr reset work is queued from a handle that owns a Controller<'bound>
> > where the work item holds references tied to the lifetime of the bound
> > device and its mapped IO state. The existing API only accepts 'static
> > work items which cannot express that relationship.
> >
> > Introduce ScopedQueue for this case. It owns the underlying workqueue
> > and ties enqueued work to the queue lifetime so borrowed state cannot
> > outlive the queue that may still run it.
> >
> > Construction is unsafe because the queue must not be leaked.
> >
> > `compile_fail` doc-tests are ignored for now as KUnit doesn't support
> > that. Enabling those tests as regular code block would raise this error:
> >
> > ERROR:root:error[E0597]: `data` does not live long enough
> > --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:22029:44
> > |
> > 22027 | let data = ();
> > | ---- binding `data` declared here
> > 22028 | // SAFETY: Queue is not leaked.
> > 22029 | queue = unsafe { new_queue(&data)? };
> > | ^^^^^ borrowed value does not live long enough
> > 22030 | }
> > | - `data` dropped here while still borrowed
> > ...
> > 22034 | }
> > | - borrow might be used here, when `queue` is dropped and runs the `Drop` code for type `ScopedQueue`
> > |
> > = note: values in a scope are dropped in the opposite order they are defined
>
> The '^^^^^' on the warning doesn't quite point at the right location.
>
> >
> > which is exactly the constraint ScopedQueue is meant to enforce.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [ Move from scoped_queue.rs to scoped.rs, which can be shared with
> > ScopedWork; add missing inline annotations. - Danilo ]
> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > rust/kernel/workqueue/mod.rs | 3 +
> > rust/kernel/workqueue/scoped.rs | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/workqueue/scoped.rs
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/workqueue/mod.rs b/rust/kernel/workqueue/mod.rs
> > index 8eb2d037be83..551fa1401b85 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/workqueue/mod.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/workqueue/mod.rs
> > @@ -212,6 +212,9 @@
> > mod builder;
> > pub use self::builder::Builder;
> >
> > +mod scoped;
> > +pub use self::scoped::ScopedQueue;
> > +
> > /// Creates a [`Work`] initialiser with the given name and a newly-created lock class.
> > #[macro_export]
> > macro_rules! new_work {
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/workqueue/scoped.rs b/rust/kernel/workqueue/scoped.rs
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..18a4b6f6cf18
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/workqueue/scoped.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Lifetime-scoped workqueues.
> > +//!
> > +//! Provides [`ScopedQueue`] for work items that may borrow data with some
> > +//! non-`'static` lifetime.
> > +//!
> > +//! Unlike [`Queue`] which only accepts `'static` work items, [`ScopedQueue`]
> > +//! owns its underlying queue and relies on that queue being dropped to drain
> > +//! pending and running work before borrowed data can go out of scope.
> > +//!
> > +//! TODO: Remove `ignore` once KUnit supports `compile_fail` on doc-tests.
> > +//! ```compile_fail,ignore
> > +//! use kernel::prelude::*;
> > +//! use kernel::workqueue::ScopedQueue;
> > +//!
> > +//! /// # Safety
> > +//! ///
> > +//! /// Returned queue must not be leaked.
> > +//! unsafe fn new_queue<'bound>(_: &'bound ()) -> Result<ScopedQueue<'bound>> {
> > +//! // SAFETY: Caller guarantees that the returned queue is not leaked.
> > +//! unsafe { ScopedQueue::new(c"scoped_queue") }
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! fn queue_outlives_borrowed_data() -> Result {
> > +//! let queue;
> > +//!
> > +//! {
> > +//! let data = ();
> > +//! // SAFETY: Queue is not leaked.
> > +//! queue = unsafe { new_queue(&data)? };
> > +//! }
> > +//! // Here the `compile_fail` is fulfilled as `queue` would be dropped
> > +//! // after `data`.
> > +//! Ok(())
> > +//! }
> > +//! ```
> > +//!
> > +//! TODO: Remove `ignore` once KUnit supports `compile_fail` on doc-tests.
> > +//! ```compile_fail,ignore
> > +//! use kernel::prelude::*;
> > +//! use kernel::sync::Arc;
> > +//! use kernel::workqueue::{
> > +//! impl_has_work,
> > +//! new_work,
> > +//! ScopedQueue,
> > +//! Work,
> > +//! WorkItem,
> > +//! };
> > +//!
> > +//! #[pin_data]
> > +//! struct BorrowedWork<'bound> {
> > +//! data: &'bound (),
> > +//! #[pin]
> > +//! work: Work<BorrowedWork<'bound>>,
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! impl_has_work! {
> > +//! impl{'bound} HasWork<BorrowedWork<'bound>> for BorrowedWork<'bound> { self.work }
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! impl<'bound> WorkItem for BorrowedWork<'bound> {
> > +//! type Pointer = Arc<Self>;
> > +//!
> > +//! fn run(_this: Arc<Self>) {}
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! impl<'bound> BorrowedWork<'bound> {
> > +//! fn new(data: &'bound ()) -> Result<Arc<Self>> {
> > +//! Arc::pin_init(
> > +//! pin_init!(Self {
> > +//! data,
> > +//! work <- new_work!("BorrowedWork::work"),
> > +//! }),
> > +//! GFP_KERNEL,
> > +//! )
> > +//! }
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! struct Handle<'bound> {
> > +//! work: Arc<BorrowedWork<'bound>>,
> > +//! wq: ScopedQueue<'bound>,
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! impl<'bound> Handle<'bound> {
> > +//! /// # Safety
> > +//! ///
> > +//! /// Returned handle must not be leaked.
> > +//! unsafe fn new(data: &'bound ()) -> Result<Self> {
> > +//! Ok(Self {
> > +//! work: BorrowedWork::new(data)?,
> > +//! // SAFETY: Caller guarantees that the returned handle is not leaked.
> > +//! wq: unsafe { ScopedQueue::new(c"handle_wq")? },
> > +//! })
> > +//! }
> > +//! }
> > +//!
> > +//! fn handle_outlives_borrowed_data() -> Result {
> > +//! let handle;
> > +//!
> > +//! {
> > +//! let data = ();
> > +//! // SAFETY: Handle is not leaked.
> > +//! handle = unsafe { Handle::new(&data)? };
> > +//!
> > +//! let _ = handle.wq.enqueue(handle.work.clone());
> > +//! }
> > +//! // Here the `compile_fail` is fulfilled as `handle` would be dropped
> > +//! // after `data`.
> > +//! Ok(())
> > +//! }
> > +//! ```
> > +
> > +use super::{
> > + OwnedQueue,
> > + Queue,
> > + RawWorkItem, //
> > +};
> > +
> > +use crate::{
> > + bindings,
> > + ffi,
> > + prelude::*, //
> > +};
> > +
> > +use core::marker::PhantomData;
> > +
> > +/// An owned workqueue that can enqueue work items borrowing from `'scope`.
> > +///
> > +/// A `ScopedQueue` must not outlive data borrowed by its work items.
> > +pub struct ScopedQueue<'scope> {
> > + inner: OwnedQueue,
> > + _scope: PhantomData<&'scope mut &'scope ()>,
> > +}
>
> A Queue is the same as a ScopedQueue<'static>, so we don't necessarily
> need a new type if we add a lifetime to Queue and add two constructors:
>
> fn new() -> Queue<'static>;
> unsafe fn new_scoped() -> Queue<'a>;

Sounds reasonable. Should I pull this series and do that approach directly on
it, or send another version for [1]?

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260617144645.253444-1-work@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Onur

>
> Alice