Re: [PATCH v9 3/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Handle optional triminfo clock correctly

Next message: Maulik Shah: "[PATCH 10/31] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add domain idle state names"
Previous message: Maulik Shah: "[PATCH 02/31] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Add domain idle state names"
In reply to: Anand Moon: "[PATCH v9 3/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Handle optional triminfo clock correctly"
Next in thread: Anand Moon: "Re: [PATCH v9 3/9] thermal/drivers/exynos: Handle optional triminfo clock correctly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Mon Sep 14 2026 - 03:07:33 EST

On 13/09/2026 16:58, Anand Moon wrote:
> The triminfo clock is obtained using devm_clk_get_optional_prepared(),

No, it is not. It is devm_clk_get().

Order your patches correctly or do not introduce bugs in patch #1 which
you then fixup in next patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof