Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: disable autosuspend on remove

From: srinivas pandruvada

Date: Mon Sep 14 2026 - 12:45:25 EST


I generally prefer the first letter after ":" is a capital letter.
That was the case in this driver then some other changes didn't follow
this convention.

If you happen to re-post, fix that.

On Mon, 2026-09-14 at 19:20 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> kxcjk1013_probe() enables runtime PM autosuspend with
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(). The probe error path correctly undoes
> this setting with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(), but the normal
> remove path only disables runtime PM.
>
> The runtime PM API requires pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() to be undone
> with pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() at driver exit unless runtime
> PM
> was enabled with devm_pm_runtime_enable(). Leaving the autosuspend
> flag
> set therefore leaves the runtime PM state incompletely cleaned up
> after
> the driver is unbound.
>
> Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() call to the remove
> path.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 124e1b1d0924 ("iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: support runtime pm")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index 166fb786425f..c6b030f64be1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -1547,6 +1547,7 @@ static void kxcjk1013_remove(struct i2c_client
> *client)
>  
>   iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  
> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&client->dev);
>   pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>   pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
>