Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] dmaengine: Move enum dma_slave_buswidth to a new header

[Frank Li]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 10:29:03AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 09:18:42AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > In preparation for the bitmap based bus width capabilities, move
> > > enum dma_slave_buswidth out of linux/dmaengine.h into a new
> > > include/linux/dma/engine/types.h.
> > >
> > > linux/dmaengine.h is included nearly everywhere, so growing it with the
> > > new interface would make every one of its users pay for it. Keeping the
> > > basic types in a separate header lets the new interface live next to it
> > > without that cost. linux/dmaengine.h includes the new header, so its
> > > users are unaffected.
> > >
> > > While at it, add the missing kernel-doc for the enum members. The block
> > > already opened with /**, so kernel-doc expected every member to be
> > > described and warned about each one of them. Describe the UNDEFINED case
> > > in particular, as its meaning depends on where the value is used.
>
> ...
>
> > >  include/linux/dmaengine.h        | 20 +++-----------------
> >
> > I think it is good to split dmengine consumer and provider header files to
> > hidden dmaengine's detail.
>
> It's indeed desirable change. but isn't it a bit out of scope of the series?
> I suggest to do one step at a time. Would it work for you?

Yes, but I hope the file name is finial expected file name. it is okay
just move enum dma_slave_buswidth to there now.

Frank

>
> > suggest name
> > 	dma/engine.h
> >
> > so we can start move more API to this files.
> >
> > after all user include this consumer header file,  old
> > include/linux/dmaengine.h rename to include/linux/dmaengine-provider.h,
> > which only include by dmaengine drivers.
>
> Traditional naming would be
> dma/engine/provider.h
> dma/engine/consumer.h
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>