Re: [PATCH RFC 05/12] usb: typec: qcom: Make typec_port accept also different structure

Next message: Danish Khateeb: "[PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: check for overflow in malloc()"
Previous message: Bryan O'Donoghue: "Re: [PATCH RFC 04/12] usb: typec: qcom: Make PMIC port probe selectable"
In reply to: David Heidelberg via B4 Relay: "[PATCH RFC 05/12] usb: typec: qcom: Make typec_port accept also different structure"
Next in thread: David Heidelberg via B4 Relay: "[PATCH RFC 04/12] usb: typec: qcom: Make PMIC port probe selectable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Bryan O'Donoghue

Date: Sat Sep 26 2026 - 09:41:25 EST

On 26/09/2026 13:40, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:

From: David Heidelberg<david@xxxxxxx>

This is needed by followup commit introducing 1st gen of type-c support.

Assisted-by: LLM
Co-developed-by: Alexey Minnekhanov<alexeymin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov<alexeymin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg<david@xxxxxxx>

Same comment.

Understood its needed but, please describe why. I haven't read the next patch yet but I guess you are going to have something other than struct pmic_typec_port *

Again a minor nit you an fixup in the next rev

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>