Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: timers: hpet: Modernize file references

[Jonathan Corbet]

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes:

> "Habil Eren Türker" <habilerenturker@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The current HPET documentation contains outdated 'file:' prefixes for
>> source tree references, which breaks proper rendering and hyperlink
>> generation under the modern Sphinx-based documentation ecosystem.
>>
>> Fix this by modernizing the paths using the standard literal backticks
>> formatting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Habil Eren Türker <habilerenturker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/timers/hpet.rst | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/timers/hpet.rst b/Documentation/timers/hpet.rst
>> index c9d05d3ca..fe02bfd5d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/timers/hpet.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/timers/hpet.rst
>> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ The driver supports detection of HPET driver allocation and initialization
>>  of the HPET before the driver module_init routine is called.  This enables
>>  platform code which uses timer 0 or 1 as the main timer to intercept HPET
>>  initialization.  An example of this initialization can be found in
>> -arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c.
>> +``arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c``.
>>  
>>  The driver provides a userspace API which resembles the API found in the
>>  RTC driver framework.  An example user space program is provided in
>> -file:samples/timers/hpet_example.c
>> +``samples/timers/hpet_example.c``
>> \ No newline at end of file
>
> That last line is something you should really have fixed before sending
> this patch.

I guess the next patch does fix it, so no need to resend for that.

One other question: did you write these patches yourself, or was there
LLM assistance involved?  In the latter case, they need Assisted-by
tags.

Thanks,

jon