Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Use consistent indentation in the example

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/09/2026 08:58, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 08:03:18AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 28/09/2026 07:33, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:33:32 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> Correct indentation in the examples to consistent 2- or 4-spaces
> >>>> indentation to fix dt-check-style warnings ("example 0
> >>>> [indent-consistent] indent mismatch ...").  Preferred is 4-spaces, but
> >>>> re-indenting entire example just for that is too much churn.
> >>>
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [1/2] dt-bindings: display: Use consistent indentation in the example
> >>>       commit: 370c5d9004f8b754351981d59fc26851bf943e93
> >>
> >> Thanks, but I expected no one will pick it up, so I asked Rob to take
> >> it, thus it is already queued.
> > 
> > Please explain your merge plans in the cover letter next time.
> 
> The merge plan was this going through drm-misc. It got reviews, no one
> applied, even Dmitry for msm only reviewed the msm-bits (second patch),
> so I asked Rob to take it. This was not planned, but result of usual
> drm-misc inactivity for bindings (many bindings were not taken in the
> past or with noticeable delay/pings).

If that happens again, could you please reply to the series on the
dri-devel list to tell it will be merged through the DT tree ? I don't
think there's any issue with merging patches that way, it's just
coordination that's lacking.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart