Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: Unify device DAX and HugeTLB vmemmap population paths

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 9/24/26 09:52, Muchun Song wrote:
> This series is split out from the earlier, larger series "mm: Generalize
> HVO for HugeTLB and device DAX" [1]. While the parent series generalizes
> vmemmap optimization across HugeTLB and device DAX, this subset addresses
> a single, self-contained step: unifying their vmemmap population paths.
> 
> After the preceding Device DAX conversion, both HugeTLB and Device DAX
> describe optimized vmemmap mappings through memory-section metadata and
> use per-zone shared tail vmemmap pages. The generic code, however, still
> carries a Device DAX-specific population flag and compound-page population
> path, along with arguments and helpers needed only by that path.
> 
> This series first removes VMEMMAP_POPULATE_DAX and moves selection and
> reference handling for the shared tail page into the common vmemmap
> population path. It then removes the generic Device DAX-specific
> compound-page population path and routes section vmemmap population
> through vmemmap_populate(). The powerpc radix path continues to use its
> architecture-specific compound-page population implementation for
> optimizable sections.
> 
> The remaining patches remove the unused ptpfn argument, open-code
> vmemmap_populate_address() now that no caller needs its returned PTE, and
> add a warning for inconsistent zone initialization of shared tail vmemmap
> pages.
> 
> This is the fourth smaller step toward the broader HVO generalization.
> After this series, HugeTLB and Device DAX use the same population model
> instead of parallel generic paths, while powerpc keeps its
> architecture-specific implementation.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260513130542.35604-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

How does this series relate to

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260927025441.741633-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

?

-- 
Cheers,

David