Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: embedded-controller: remove #address-cells and #size-cells from required

Next message: Heiko St&#xFC;bner: "Re: [PATCH v5 08/21] drm/bridge: inno-hdmi: Split probe out of bind"
Previous message: Rupesh Majhi: "[PATCH v10 4/4] iio: pressure: dps310: assert the lock at runtime too"
In reply to: Frank . Li: "[PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: embedded-controller: remove #address-cells and #size-cells from required"
Next in thread: Frank Li: "Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: embedded-controller: remove #address-cells and #size-cells from required"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Wed Sep 30 2026 - 06:02:39 EST

On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:37:51PM -0400, Frank.Li@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
>
> The "^fan-controller@[0-9a-f]+$" child node is optional, so it is not

Why is it optional? Hardware can be fan-less? This should be the reason
here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof