Re: [PATCH] media: mali-c55: Fix frame sequence numbers on dual-pipe hardware

[David CARLIER]

Hi Jacopo

On ..., Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> I would rather handle this with per-ouput queue counters ?

Right, START(n+1) is processed before the DONE(n) bits when both are
pending.

A per-queue counter would not advance on underflow though, hiding the
dropped frame. Would latching the sequence in
mali_c55_set_next_buffer() work for you instead?

Cheers.