Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Allow funnel clocks

[Leo Yan]

Hi Rob,

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:28:33PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Some static funnel nodes have APB and AT clocks. Allow one or two
> clocks and the apb_pclk and atclk clock-names entries.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>  .../bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml      | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml
> index 9598a3d0a95b..4a3d08f9568c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-funnel.yaml
> @@ -30,6 +30,16 @@ properties:
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  clocks:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    items:
> +      - const: apb_pclk
> +      - const: atclk

The question is that a static funnel does not need to program any
registers, so in theory it should only need atclk as the module's core
clock, but not the APB programming clock (apb_pclk).

Maybe I did not get this right when I initially enabled the static
funnel in hi3660-coresight.dtsi. We should probably remove pclk from the
static funnel node.

  clocks:
    minItems: 0
    maxItems: 1

  clock-names:
    minItems: 0
    items:
      - const: atclk

Thanks,
Leo