Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] rust: sync: add const constructor for raw_spinlock_t

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 9:30 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +// Explicitly list architectures where this logic is checked correct.
> +#[cfg(any(
> +    CONFIG_ARM,
> +    CONFIG_ARM64,
> +    CONFIG_LOONGARCH,
> +    CONFIG_PPC,
> +    CONFIG_RISCV,
> +    CONFIG_S390,
> +    CONFIG_X86,
> +))]

Sashiko is right, we need UML here to avoid a build error.

However, I think we should be specific, just in case, and thus use
`CONFIG_UML_X86` instead of `CONFIG_UML`, since this list is about
having checked that the logic is correct manually.

Cheers,
Miguel