Re: [PATCH v21 10/23] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Sat Oct 03 2026 - 13:29:43 EST
On Sat, 03 Oct 2026 17:12:28 +0100,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03/10/2026 16:30, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 03/10/2026 10:01, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:06:50 +0100,
> >> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Add VM type specific S2 MMU operation backends which can be
> >>> initialized per
> >>> VM flavor, to keep the handling cleaner.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes since v19:
> >>> - Add a blank line in kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()
> >
> >
> >>> struct kvm_s2_mmu {
> >>> struct kvm_vmid vmid;
> >>> @@ -332,6 +345,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> >>> */
> >>> u64 fgu[__NR_FGT_GROUP_IDS__];
> >>> + const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops *vm_s2_ops;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> If you're touching this patch, can you please move this pointer next
> >> to the vcpu_ops pointer?
> >
> > Sure, I will do that.
>
> Sorry, this is only stored in kvm_arch, while the vcpu_ops are stored
> in the vcpu_arch, to avoid pointer chasing vcpu->kvm->arch->.
Ah, my bad,
> I could move it closer to the vm_flavor ?
Maybe. Check whether that introduces a hole or not (I'm trying to keep
this structure as packed as possible). But we can always change this
later on.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.