Re: [PATCH] virtiofs: validate fixed-output response length

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sun, Oct 04, 2026 at 09:34:05PM +0900, sungbyeongchan wrote:
> A short successful virtiofs response can leave the fixed-output
> portion of the request argument buffer unwritten. The completion path
> nevertheless copies the full declared output to the request destination,
> allowing stale allocator contents to reach callers such as
> fuse_statfs().
> 
> Require successful fixed-output responses to contain their complete
> declared output. Continue to permit a shorter final argument only for
> out_argvar requests, and do not copy output arguments from error
> replies.
> 
> A header-only FUSE_STATFS success returned stale fields in nine of
> nine calls across three boots. The patched kernel rejected the short
> response in three boots and preserved complete replies and existing
> error controls.
> 
> Fixes: a62a8ef9d97d ("virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem")
> Signed-off-by: sungbyeongchan <tjdqudcks0424@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index f15e516ebcb5c..288848f23e7ec 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,10 @@ static void copy_args_from_argbuf(struct fuse_args *args, struct fuse_req *req)
>  	unsigned int num_out;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> +	/* Error replies contain only the output header. */
> +	if (req->out.h.error)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	remaining = req->out.h.len - sizeof(req->out.h);
>  	num_in = args->in_numargs - args->in_pages;
>  	num_out = args->out_numargs - args->out_pages;
> @@ -755,6 +759,7 @@ static void copy_args_from_argbuf(struct fuse_args *args, struct fuse_req *req)
>  	if (args->out_argvar)
>  		args->out_args[args->out_numargs - 1].size = remaining;
>  
> +out:
>  	kfree(req->argbuf);
>  	req->argbuf = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -762,7 +767,9 @@ static void copy_args_from_argbuf(struct fuse_args *args, struct fuse_req *req)
>  /* Verify that the server properly follows the FUSE protocol */
>  static bool virtio_fs_verify_response(struct fuse_req *req, unsigned int len)
>  {
> +	struct fuse_args *args = req->args;
>  	struct fuse_out_header *oh = &req->out.h;
> +	unsigned int expected;
>  
>  	if (len < sizeof(*oh)) {
>  		pr_warn("virtio-fs: response too short (%u)\n", len);
> @@ -777,6 +784,25 @@ static bool virtio_fs_verify_response(struct fuse_req *req, unsigned int len)
>  			oh->unique, req->in.h.unique);
>  		return false;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (oh->error) {
> +		if (len != sizeof(*oh)) {
> +			pr_warn("virtio-fs: error response too long (%u)\n", len);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	expected = sizeof(*oh) +
> +		   fuse_len_args(args->out_numargs, args->out_args);
> +	if (len > expected ||
> +	    (len < expected &&
> +	     (!args->out_argvar ||
> +	      expected - len > args->out_args[args->out_numargs - 1].size))) {
> +		pr_warn("virtio-fs: invalid response length (%u, expected %u)\n",
> +			len, expected);

why let remote connections spam the kernel log?  And you don't need the
"prefix" of virtio-fs for pr_*() calls if it is working properly.

thanks,

greg k-h