Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_synproxy: only handle pure SYN and ACK packets

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

On Sun, Oct 04, 2026 at 11:06:15PM +0700, Nguyen Ngoc Thang wrote:
> nft_synproxy treats any segment with SYN set as a client's initial SYN
> and any segment with ACK set as the client's final ACK. A SYN-ACK thus
> gets answered with a fresh SYN-ACK cookie.
> 
> If that reply is routed back to the same host, e.g. to a peer address
> covered by an address on lo, it re-enters the input hook, is answered
> again, and never stops. Every such SYN starts its own endless loop over
> the loopback backlog, so NET_RX softirq keeps the CPU busy and memory
> fills with skbs and rtable entries until workqueues stall and the
> machine OOMs.
> 
> Use the same flag checks as ip(6)t_SYNPROXY: SYN without ACK, FIN or
> RST is an initial SYN; ACK without SYN, FIN or RST is the client ACK.
> Anything else falls through to the next expression.

Wrong tree. This proposal has to go through nf-next.

> Fixes: ad49d86e07a4 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Add synproxy support")
> Reported-by: syzbot+d7795c8487ca4e20ed88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d7795c8487ca4e20ed88
> Reported-by: syzbot+d0d2f1a65f45b319d25d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d0d2f1a65f45b319d25d
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Notes (not for the changelog):
> 
> Reproduced in QEMU (x86_64, 2 vCPUs, KASAN+lockdep) with syzbot's C
> repro for d7795c8487ca4e20ed88. Minimised: only the nft batch and the
> injected SYN matter, which is exactly the d0d2f1a65f45b319d25d program.
> 
> The rule is an inet table, base chain on input, with an unconditional
> "synproxy" expression. The SYN goes from 172.20.20.187 to .170 via tun;
> syzkaller puts 172.20.20.10/24 on lo, so the whole /24 is local and the
> SYN-ACK cookie comes back through lo. Instrumented trace:
> 
>   synproxy tx .170->.187 in=syz_tun out=lo syn=1 ack=1
>   synproxy tx .187->.170 in=lo      out=lo syn=1 ack=1
>   synproxy tx .170->.187 in=lo      out=lo syn=1 ack=1
>   ...
> 
> Before (3fd2ff60f6d6, full C repro):
>   - synproxy syn_received ~400k per CPU per netns after 15s
>   - rtable 80k -> 295k, skbuff_head_cache >1M, softirq time explodes
>   - "BUG: workqueue lockup", then OOM / hung task, VM wedges
> 
> After (2 runs x 300s, full C repro):
>   - no lockup, hung task or OOM
>   - rtable flat (~2.2k), skbuff_head_cache flat (~80k)
>   - syn_received grows slowly (~9.5k/300s): real SYNs still answered
> 
> ACK|FIN and ACK|RST no longer hit the cookie check (and its NF_DROP);
> they continue, as with ip(6)t_SYNPROXY's XT_CONTINUE. The usual
> "ct state invalid drop" rule still catches them.
> 
>  net/netfilter/nft_synproxy.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_synproxy.c b/net/netfilter/nft_synproxy.c
> index 9ed288c9d168..a580cb7324da 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_synproxy.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_synproxy.c
> @@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ static void nft_synproxy_eval_v4(const struct nft_synproxy *priv,
>  	struct synproxy_net *snet = synproxy_pernet(net);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
>  
> -	if (tcp->syn) {
> +	if (tcp->syn && !(tcp->ack || tcp->fin || tcp->rst)) {
>  		/* Initial SYN from client */
>  		nft_synproxy_tcp_options(opts, tcp, snet, &info);
>  		synproxy_send_client_synack(net, skb, tcp, opts);
>  		consume_skb(skb);
>  		regs->verdict.code = NF_STOLEN;
> -	} else if (tcp->ack) {
> +	} else if (tcp->ack && !(tcp->fin || tcp->rst || tcp->syn)) {
>  		/* ACK from client */
>  		if (synproxy_recv_client_ack(net, skb, tcp, opts,
>  					     ntohl(tcp->seq))) {
> @@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ static void nft_synproxy_eval_v6(const struct nft_synproxy *priv,
>  	struct synproxy_net *snet = synproxy_pernet(net);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = pkt->skb;
>  
> -	if (tcp->syn) {
> +	if (tcp->syn && !(tcp->ack || tcp->fin || tcp->rst)) {
>  		/* Initial SYN from client */
>  		nft_synproxy_tcp_options(opts, tcp, snet, &info);
>  		synproxy_send_client_synack_ipv6(net, skb, tcp, opts);
>  		consume_skb(skb);
>  		regs->verdict.code = NF_STOLEN;
> -	} else if (tcp->ack) {
> +	} else if (tcp->ack && !(tcp->fin || tcp->rst || tcp->syn)) {
>  		/* ACK from client */
>  		if (synproxy_recv_client_ack_ipv6(net, skb, tcp, opts,
>  						  ntohl(tcp->seq))) {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>