Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 9/22/26 15:38, Chris Li wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 8:56 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:50 PM Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> No that time slot is too late for Asia developers. I don't think we
>>> should use that time slot for swap alignment.
>>>
>>> We should find a time slot more friendly to Asia.
>>
>> Any time slot would have that kind of problem. We're spread out across
>> the globe.
>>
>> Let's just use a standardized time slot we have for MM alignment sessions.
> 
> There are more swap maintainers in Asia than in the US + Europe, at
> least based on the maintainer file. Please be more inclusive. If the
> alignment is done without key stakeholders, it miss the point.
> 
> Sigh, we can't even align on a time slot.
> 
> In that case, let's keep discussing on the mailing list. At least it
> is accessible to every one.

Looking at the mailing list, that approach doesn't seem to work.

Finding a time slot that makes US, Europe and Asia happy is ... tricky.

1 AM is certainly unpleasant.

US vs. Asia is also tricky, but doable.

China 8AM vs. US West Coast 5PM?

China 9AM vs. US West Coast 6PM?

(Europe is 2AM vs. 3AM, who besides me from Europe would join?)

-- 
Cheers,

David