Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the kbuild tree

[Nathan Chancellor]

Hi Mark,

On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 01:11:49AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 01:06:32AM +0200, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 12:42:58AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> 
> > Thanks, the 'source' line looks correct to me now. Did you also shuffle
> > CC_OPT_INLINE_MEMSET into scripts/Kconfig.toolchain like below? You had
> > it right in
> 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/ar5-4Yq3wtmXTWnD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> > but the patch changed slightly since that resolution ('4294967295' to
> > '4294967294') due to a problem I reported
> 
> That will be delayed for today since the scripting has got confused by
> me moving machines in the middle of running the merge but it has gone in
> later in the merge so it should be there in the final tree, and
> hopefully in the right place next time I run -next (due to LPC/MS it'll
> be spotty at best this week, I and everyone likely to provide backup are
> all in Prauge).

Can you drop the fix up to scripts/Kconfig.toolchain that you added in

  855c706f2179 ("Merge branch 'for-next' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git";)

? I have temporarily handled this conflict in kbuild-for-next to make
life easier for you in

  fd79efef14d9 ("Merge commit 'ac7445c28e7a' into kbuild-for-next")

and your fix up conflicts with it, as CC_OPT_INLINE_MEMSET is defined
twice.

-- 
Cheers,
Nathan