Re: netdev LLM review for backports (WAS: [PATCH 5.10.y] net: sched: cls_u32: Undo tcf_bind_filter if u32_replace_hw_knode)

Next message: sungbyeongchan: "[PATCH] btrfs: preserve caller ownership of anon_dev on root insert retry"
Previous message: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: reject expired interval ends"
In reply to: Sasha Levin: "netdev LLM review for backports (WAS: [PATCH 5.10.y] net: sched: cls_u32: Undo tcf_bind_filter if u32_replace_hw_knode)"
Next in thread: Florian Fainelli: "Re: netdev LLM review for backports (WAS: [PATCH 5.10.y] net: sched: cls_u32: Undo tcf_bind_filter if u32_replace_hw_knode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jakub Kicinski

Date: Mon Oct 05 2026 - 17:21:42 EST

On Mon, 5 Oct 2026 10:00:46 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote:
> I started seeing these reviews on proposed backports of net/ commits, and while
> they are REALLY great for upstream commits, I do not think that these comments
> make sense in the context of a backport.

Blah, sorry about that.
Let me add a regex on the tags to exclude patches with 5.x/6.x/7.x