Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: only use THE REST as a fallback

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> Hmm, for me this will be a major problem.
> 
> As the Xen code maintainer I have stumbled over problematic patches which
> were NOT sent to x86 or xen ML several times, which made it possible to catch
> potential regressions early.
> 
> Having to subscribe to each potentially interesting ML (or using korgalore on
> those) would not be my preferred workflow.
> 
> This isn't a NACK, but maybe there are others with similar interests/problems.
> 
> Or is korgalore capable of pulling ALL kernel related mails without having to
> spell out the MLs explicitly?

Yes, if we do add patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as the always-on archive list, you'd
be able to run lei/korgalore to get the exact current LKML firehose by doing
something like "l:linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org OR l:patches.lists.linux.dev"
and then deduping by MID.

-K