Re: [PATCH 1/1] dmaengine: change dmaengine_get_unmap_data() first arg to dma_chan

[Vinod Koul]

On 22-09-26, 16:09, Dave Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/22/26 11:45 AM, Frank.Li@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Replace the struct device *dev argument with struct dma_chan *chan so
> > callers do not need to reach into the dma_device internals to obtain
> > the device pointer.  The implementation now derives the device via
> > dmaengine_get_dma_device(chan), which correctly handles the per-channel
> > IOMMU mapping case.
> > 
> > Prepare to make dma_device private and make dmaengine API consistent.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> 
> For the NTB bits:
> Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  crypto/async_tx/async_memcpy.c      | 4 ++--
> >  crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c          | 4 ++--
> >  crypto/async_tx/async_raid6_recov.c | 4 ++--
> >  crypto/async_tx/async_xor.c         | 8 ++++----
> 
> Maybe one day Dan's wishes will become true and someone will finally deprecate async_tx....

Does Intel still have use it. I am looking at fixing the names and we
can drop async_tx completely...? 

-- 
~Vinod