Re: [PATCH] mm/madvise: add cond_resched() in THP branch of madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range()

From: Gregory Price

Date: Sat Oct 10 2026 - 10:28:37 EST


On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 10:40:42AM +0800, albin_yang@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Wei Yang <albinwyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Crash log:
> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#63 stuck for 23s! [stress-ng-vm:1665914]
> ...
> Call trace:
> pmdp_invalidate+0x48/0x68
> madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range+0x84c/0xb00
> walk_pmd_range.isra.0+0x1ac/0x3b0
> walk_pud_range+0x120/0x190
> walk_pgd_range+0x170/0x1b8
> __walk_page_range+0x184/0x198
> walk_page_range_vma+0x94/0x128
> madvise_cold+0xd8/0x198
> madvise_vma_behavior+0x234/0x638
> madvise_walk_vmas.constprop.0+0xdc/0x210
> madvise_do_behavior+0xa8/0x328
> do_madvise+0xd8/0x140
> __arm64_sys_madvise+0x2c/0xe0
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <albinwyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index eeee82cf2b3f..0755e6d99757 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> spin_unlock(ptl);
> if (pageout)
> reclaim_pages(&folio_list);
> + cond_resched();
> return 0;
> }
>

This same improvement came naturally from refactoring the entire
function into a proper pagewalk structure:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260922235830.2350770-10-gourry@xxxxxxxxxx/

this function is really nasty.

~Gregory