Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double release in ufshcd_abort()

[Stanley Jhu]

On 10/21/26 9:37 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Do we really need the code that checks that a command has completed
> without notification interrupt? I have never encountered any logs on
> any test setup that indicates that this happened.

Agreed, we do not need this branch, and v5 removes it. If a completion
interrupt is lost or arrives after the command times out, leaving the
command to the SCSI error handler makes recovery slower in that rare
corner case, which is acceptable since it only happens after a timeout.

I will send v5 shortly.