Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c.

Next message: Amirmohammad Eftekhar: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Restore L2's DEBUGCTL/BNDCFGS/CET from vmcs12 on RSM and nested state restore"
Previous message: James Clark: "[PATCH 1/2] perf test: Factor out the --skip check and its output"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c."
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Christian Zigotzky

Date: Fri Oct 23 2026 - 05:09:55 EST

On 23 October 2026 at 08:48 am, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This patch received reports which basically rejected the patch for
inclusion and we wait for proper, fixed version, as explained in
submitting patches document.

Patch also did not follow standard naming rules of commits, so again,
please read the docs (submitting patches) how to properly describe and
send your contribution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

- - -

Hi Krzysztof,

But the patch has been ready for a long time; it has also been tested and is already in the right place: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20260801043458.12500-1-chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,
Christian